In a rare but decisive move, the European Union has warned Serbia—a key state for Balkan stability and an EU candidate country—to engage more constructively with the EU during its accession process and to distance itself from external powers like Russia and China, the latter of which has an increasingly prominent presence in the Balkans.
The EU’s warning was included in its annual report on Serbia, part of the so-called ‘Enlargement Package’—a comprehensive assessment detailing the progress and current status of Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Kosovo, Montenegro, North Macedonia, Serbia, Georgia, the Republic of Moldova, Ukraine, and Turkey on their respective paths towards EU accession.
On one hand, Serbia was commended for meeting the benchmarks required to open Cluster 3 (‘Competitiveness and Inclusive Growth’). However, Brussels emphasised that in the coming year, Belgrade is expected to accelerate the implementation of EU accession-related reforms across several other areas, with particular emphasis on strengthening the rule of law and ensuring a genuinely enabling environment for civil society and the media. Additionally, Serbia was urged to make credible efforts to counter disinformation and prevent foreign information manipulation.
The EU’s sharpest remarks towards Serbia, however, centred on Belgrade’s distinctive and complex foreign policy stance. Indeed, while Serbia has officially declared EU membership a strategic priority, it continues to nurture close ties both with Moscow and, more recently, increasingly with Beijing—a ‘trilateral’ geopolitical position that is “raising questions about Serbia’s strategic direction,” the EU cautioned. Furthermore, Serbia, even if it is providing “financial and humanitarian support” to Ukraine, it “still does not to align with any restrictive measures against the Russian Federation,” i.e. the sanctions against Moscow and it has “maintained high-level relations with the Russian Federation and intensified its relations with China,” the report reads.
Among the EU’s most pressing concerns regarding Serbia, the report highlighted that Serbia has continued to prevent circumvention of EU restrictive measures introduced in response to Russia’s aggression against Ukraine via Serbian territory or through legal entities registered in Serbia. Furthermore, Serbia has maintained close relations and strategic partnerships with Russia. The EU also urged Serbia to reduce its dependency on Gazprom and the Russian-majority ownership of Serbia’s critical infrastructure and oil industry.
Regarding Beijing, the EU noted Serbia’s deepening ties with China, highlighted by the entry into force of a Free Trade Agreement with China on 1 July, a move the EU considers a “strategic concern” for the bloc.
Criticism of Serbia’s foreign policy was strengthened by the strong language used by High Representative Josep Borrell. “We want to count on Serbia as a partner with shared principles, values, security, and prosperity, and we need Serbia to reassure us of its strategic direction,” Borrell stated following the report’s release. “We have been crystal clear with our partners—including Serbia—that relations with Russia cannot proceed as business as usual under Putin’s regime, especially in light of Russia’s attack against Ukraine. The deepening of Serbia’s relationship with China is also a strategic concern in the current geopolitical context,” he emphasised.
“I think that Serbia, sooner or later, will have to align their foreign policy with the European Union’s foreign policy. Otherwise, membership will be jeopardised,” Borrell said.
It should also be noted that European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen cancelled talks with Serbian Prime Minister Milos Vucevic at the end of October following his meeting with a Russian minister.
The criticism from Brussels was received tepidly in Belgrade, with President Aleksandar Vucic acknowledging the EU’s assessment of Serbian foreign policy and commending ironically Brussels for “understanding” how Serbia is behaving in the global sphere. However, he made no mention of any intention to change this policy or to consider implementing sanctions against Russia or reducing cooperation with China, particularly in the economic and infrastructure sectors.
This combination of EU criticism and Serbia’s cold response suggests that, despite the EU’s promises to accelerate enlargement in the Balkans, the bloc’s appeal in the region—particularly in Serbia—is still diminishing. On the other side, it appears the EU is prepared to press Belgrade for alignment in foreign policy, which risks sidelining further Serbia, a key-country in the Balkans, in the accession process.